top of page

CrPC Section 164

CrPC Section 164 details the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a Magistrate to ensure legality and voluntariness.

CrPC Section 164 provides the legal framework for recording confessions and statements by a Magistrate. This process ensures that any confession or statement made by an accused or witness is voluntary, truthful, and recorded in a proper manner. Understanding this section is crucial for safeguarding the rights of individuals and maintaining the integrity of criminal proceedings.

The section plays a vital procedural role by mandating that confessions and statements be recorded before a Magistrate, thereby preventing coercion or forced admissions. It also helps courts rely on such recorded statements as credible evidence during trials.

CrPC Section 164 – Exact Provision

This section authorizes Magistrates to record confessions or statements in a private setting to ensure the person is not influenced or intimidated. The recorded statement must be read back to the person, allowing them to correct or modify it before signing. This process guarantees the authenticity and voluntariness of the confession or statement, which is critical for its admissibility in court.

  • Magistrate records confession or statement in private.

  • Person can review and modify the recorded statement.

  • Signed by both the person and Magistrate to confirm authenticity.

  • Ensures voluntariness and prevents coercion.

  • Forms admissible evidence in criminal trials.

Explanation of CrPC Section 164

This section means that a Magistrate must personally record any confession or statement made by an accused or witness, ensuring it is voluntary and accurate.

  • The Magistrate hears and records the confession or statement privately.

  • It applies to accused persons and witnesses involved in criminal cases.

  • The statement must be read back for corrections before signing.

  • Allows the Magistrate to ensure no force or threat was used.

  • Confessions made outside this procedure may be inadmissible.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 164

The section exists to protect individuals from forced or false confessions and to maintain the integrity of evidence. It ensures that confessions and statements are recorded fairly and voluntarily, balancing the need for effective investigation with protection of personal rights.

  • Protects accused and witnesses from coercion.

  • Ensures procedural fairness in recording statements.

  • Balances police powers with individual rights.

  • Prevents misuse of confessions in trials.

When CrPC Section 164 Applies

This section applies whenever a confession or statement is to be recorded by a Magistrate during investigation or trial stages, especially before judicial proceedings commence.

  • Applies when a confession or statement is made to a Magistrate.

  • Magistrates empowered under CrPC have authority.

  • Used during investigation or before trial.

  • No strict time limit but must be before judicial proceedings.

  • Exceptions if statement made to police or other officials.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 164

Cognizance under Section 164 is taken when a Magistrate receives a confession or statement voluntarily. The Magistrate examines the person privately, records the statement, and ensures it is signed after reading. This recorded statement can then be used as evidence in court.

  • Magistrate personally examines the person in private.

  • Records the confession or statement in writing.

  • Ensures the person signs after reading and confirming.

Bailability under CrPC Section 164

Section 164 itself does not specify bailability, as it deals with recording statements. However, the nature of the offence related to the confession or statement determines bailability. The section ensures statements are recorded properly regardless of bail status.

  • Bailability depends on the offence, not Section 164.

  • Statements recorded can influence bail decisions.

  • Proper recording protects accused rights during bail proceedings.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 164)

Matters involving Section 164 statements are triable by the Magistrate or the court handling the case. The Magistrate who records the statement may not try the case but the statement is admissible in any competent court.

  • Magistrate records the statement.

  • Trial can be before Magistrate or Sessions Court depending on offence.

  • Recorded statements are admissible evidence in trial courts.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 164

Decisions related to recording statements under Section 164 can be challenged through appeals or revisions in higher courts. If a confession is alleged to be coerced, courts may exclude it, and such rulings can be appealed.

  • Appeal lies to Sessions Court or High Court depending on case.

  • Revision petitions can challenge Magistrate’s recording procedure.

  • Timelines depend on case type and court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 164 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft. During investigation, the Magistrate records X’s confession under Section 164 in private. X reads the statement, requests a correction, and signs it voluntarily. This recorded confession becomes crucial evidence during trial, ensuring the confession was not forced and is reliable.

  • Section 164 ensured the confession was voluntary and accurate.

  • Key takeaway: Proper recording protects rights and aids justice.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 164

Section 164 has evolved to strengthen protections against forced confessions. Earlier laws lacked clear safeguards, leading to misuse. Amendments have emphasized private recording and the accused’s right to review statements.

  • Introduced to prevent coerced confessions.

  • Amended to require reading back statements.

  • Enhanced procedural safeguards over time.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 164

In 2026, Section 164 remains vital for ensuring fair criminal procedures. With concerns over custodial torture and forced confessions, this section safeguards human rights and supports judicial integrity in modern policing and trials.

  • Protects against custodial pressure and torture.

  • Supports digital recording initiatives for transparency.

  • Ensures admissible and reliable evidence in courts.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 164

  • Section 161 – Police examination of witnesses

  • Section 167 – Procedure when investigation cannot be completed

  • Section 173 – Report of police officer on completion of investigation

  • Section 313 – Examination of accused during trial

  • Section 25 of Evidence Act – Confession to police not relevant

Case References under CrPC Section 164

  1. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Rajesh Gautam (2003, AIR 2003 SC 3052)

    – Confession recorded under Section 164 must be voluntary and free from coercion to be admissible.

  2. Ramesh Kumari v. State of Delhi (2006, AIR 2006 SC 1525)

    – Magistrate must ensure accused understands confession and it is recorded properly.

  3. Selvi v. State of Karnataka (2010, AIR 2010 SC 1974)

    – Protection against self-incrimination linked with recording of statements.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 164

  • Section:

    164

  • Title:

    Recording Confessions and Statements

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, accused, witnesses

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate records confession/statement in private

  • Bailability:

    Not specified; depends on offence

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate or Sessions Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 164

CrPC Section 164 is a cornerstone of criminal procedure that ensures confessions and statements are recorded fairly and voluntarily. It protects individuals from coercion and safeguards the integrity of evidence, which is crucial for just trials.

By mandating Magistrate involvement and allowing the person to review and correct the statement, this section balances investigative needs with personal rights. Understanding Section 164 helps citizens and legal practitioners appreciate the safeguards in the criminal justice system.

FAQs on CrPC Section 164

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 164?

Its main purpose is to ensure that confessions and statements are recorded by a Magistrate in a voluntary and fair manner, protecting individuals from forced admissions.

Who can record a confession under Section 164?

Only a Magistrate empowered under the CrPC can record confessions or statements under this section, ensuring legal validity.

Can a person modify their statement recorded under Section 164?

Yes, after the statement is read back, the person can request corrections or modifications before signing it.

Is a confession recorded under Section 164 admissible in court?

Yes, if recorded properly and voluntarily, such confessions are admissible as evidence during trials.

Does Section 164 deal with bail matters?

No, Section 164 focuses on recording statements; bail decisions depend on the nature of the offence and other provisions.

Related Sections

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 37 details the powers of the Consumer Commission to summon and enforce attendance of witnesses and production of documents.

Section 180 of the Income Tax Act 1961 deals with penalties for failure to comply with certain notices or directions under Indian tax law.

Casinos are legal in India only in certain states under strict regulations and licenses.

CrPC Section 446A prescribes punishment for false information leading to wrongful arrest or detention.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 115AB prescribes special tax rates for foreign companies on royalty and fees for technical services.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 58 outlines the powers of the Central Consumer Protection Authority for investigation and enforcement.

IqOption Wallet is not legally recognized in India; trading or using it involves risks under Indian law.

CrPC Section 156 empowers police to investigate cognizable offences upon receiving information or magistrate's order.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 129 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Section 206CCA of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates higher TDS rates for non-filers of income tax returns in India.

IPC Section 300 defines murder, detailing when culpable homicide amounts to murder under Indian law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 135 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance under the Act.

CrPC Section 21 defines the powers of police officers to investigate cognizable offences and outlines their authority during investigations.

DBS Bank operates legally in India under RBI regulations with a full banking license and strict compliance.

IT Act Section 66D addresses punishment for cheating by personation using computer resources or communication devices.

CPC Section 139 details the procedure for filing a written statement by the defendant in civil suits.

CrPC Section 198 details the procedure for complaints and prosecution in cases of offences against public servants.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 245BC deals with the procedure for refund of excess tax after adjustment of arrears or advance tax.

Companies Act 2013 Section 138 governs the punishment for failure to file financial statements or annual returns on time.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 101 defines the holder in due course and their rights under the Act.

Contract Act 1872 Section 3 defines when an agreement becomes a contract by establishing enforceability conditions.

Laughing gas (nitrous oxide) is regulated and largely illegal for recreational use in India with strict controls and penalties.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 50 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

IPC Section 148 addresses rioting armed with a deadly weapon, defining the offence and its legal consequences.

IPC Section 115 defines the offence of abetment of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, outlining its scope and punishment.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 38 covering payment of tax and related procedures.

Companies Act 2013 Section 99 governs the procedure for removal of auditors before expiry of term.

bottom of page