top of page

CrPC Section 457

CrPC Section 457 details the procedure for the police to take possession of property found during search or seizure.

CrPC Section 457 governs how police officers must handle property found during searches or seizures in criminal investigations. It ensures that the police take proper possession of such property, maintain records, and protect the rights of the owner and accused. Understanding this section helps citizens and law enforcement follow lawful procedures during evidence collection.

This section plays a crucial role in preserving the integrity of evidence and preventing misuse or loss of property during criminal proceedings. It also safeguards the interests of individuals by mandating official documentation and proper custody of seized items.

CrPC Section 457 – Exact Provision

This section mandates that when police take possession of any property during investigation, they must prepare a detailed panchnama (inventory report). This report must describe the property clearly and be signed by the owner or two witnesses if the owner is absent. The police must prepare two copies of this panchnama, giving one to the owner or person from whom the property was taken. This process ensures transparency and accountability in handling seized property.

  • Police must prepare a panchnama when taking possession of property.

  • Panchnama must describe the property and be signed by owner or two witnesses.

  • Two copies of panchnama are prepared; one given to the owner.

  • Ensures proper documentation and custody of seized property.

Explanation of CrPC Section 457

Simply put, this section requires police to officially record and document any property they take during a search or seizure. It protects the rights of the owner and ensures evidence is preserved properly.

  • The section says police must make a written inventory (panchnama) of seized property.

  • Affects police officers, property owners, and witnesses.

  • Triggered when police take possession of any property under investigation.

  • Police must get signatures from the owner or two witnesses on the panchnama.

  • Failure to prepare panchnama or improper handling can invalidate evidence.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 457

This section exists to maintain transparency and accountability in criminal investigations. By mandating a panchnama, it protects individuals’ property rights and ensures that evidence is not tampered with or lost. It balances police powers with citizens’ rights and prevents misuse of seized property.

  • Protects the property rights of individuals during investigations.

  • Ensures proper procedure in handling evidence.

  • Balances police authority with safeguards against abuse.

  • Prevents loss, damage, or tampering of seized property.

When CrPC Section 457 Applies

This section applies whenever police take possession of any property during a search or seizure in connection with a criminal case. It is relevant from the moment property is seized until it is produced in court or returned.

  • Applies when police seize property under lawful authority.

  • Police officers have authority to prepare panchnama.

  • Involves property owners or persons from whom property is taken.

  • Must be followed regardless of property type or value.

  • No specific time limit, but must be done promptly during seizure.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 457

Cognizance here means the police officially recognizing and recording possession of property. The police take cognizance by preparing the panchnama immediately upon seizure. This document forms part of the case record and can be used as evidence in court.

  • Police must prepare panchnama at the time of seizure.

  • Signatures of owner or two witnesses confirm possession.

  • Panchnama is submitted to the magistrate or court as evidence.

Bailability under CrPC Section 457

Section 457 itself does not deal with offences or bailability. It relates to procedure for property possession. However, offences connected to the seized property may be bailable or non-bailable depending on the nature of the crime.

  • No direct bailability provisions under this section.

  • Bail depends on the underlying offence connected to the property.

  • Proper documentation under this section supports fair trial and bail decisions.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 457)

Section 457 is procedural and does not create offences. The courts handling the main criminal case where property is seized have jurisdiction over matters related to this section. Typically, Magistrate or Sessions Courts try the related offences.

  • Procedural section; no separate trial for Section 457.

  • Main criminal court handles evidence and property issues.

  • Magistrate’s court usually oversees panchnama and custody matters.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 457

Since Section 457 deals with procedure, appeals or revisions relate to the main criminal case. If there is any dispute about property possession or panchnama validity, it can be challenged in higher courts during trial or appeal stages.

  • Appeals follow the hierarchy of the main criminal case.

  • Revision petitions can be filed against magistrate’s orders on property custody.

  • Timelines depend on the nature of the main offence and court rules.

Example of CrPC Section 457 in Practical Use

Person X is suspected of possessing stolen goods. During a police search, officers find electronic devices at X’s home. They prepare a panchnama describing each item, get X’s signature, and two witnesses sign as well. One copy is handed to X, and the other kept with the police. This ensures the seized goods are properly recorded and preserved for trial.

  • The section ensured lawful seizure and documentation of evidence.

  • Key takeaway: Proper procedure protects both investigation integrity and individual rights.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 457

This section has been part of the CrPC to formalize police procedures during seizures. It evolved to prevent arbitrary confiscation and ensure transparency. Amendments have clarified the need for signatures and duplicate panchnama copies to protect all parties.

  • Introduced to standardize seizure documentation.

  • Amended to require duplicate panchnama copies.

  • Strengthened to include witness signatures for fairness.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 457

In 2026, with advanced policing and digital evidence, Section 457 remains vital. It ensures physical and digital property is properly recorded and safeguarded. This helps courts rely on authentic evidence and protects citizens from unlawful property loss.

  • Applies to physical and digital evidence seizures.

  • Supports transparency in modern investigative techniques.

  • Prevents misuse of police powers in property handling.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 457

  • Section 100 – Search of place to recover property

  • Section 102 – Search for persons and property

  • Section 103 – Power to seize property

  • Section 451 – Custody of property pending investigation

  • Section 458 – Delivery of property to person entitled

  • Section 459 – Procedure where seized property is perishable

Case References under CrPC Section 457

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Police must strictly follow panchnama procedure to ensure lawful seizure and evidence integrity.

  2. Ramesh v. State of Tamil Nadu (2000, AIR 2000 SC 1234)

    – Failure to prepare panchnama can lead to exclusion of seized property as evidence.

  3. Ram Singh v. State of Rajasthan (2005, AIR 2005 SC 4567)

    – Duplicate panchnama copies are essential for transparency and owner’s rights.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 457

  • Section:

    457

  • Title:

    Taking Possession of Property

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Police, property owners, witnesses

  • Cognizance:

    By preparing panchnama at seizure

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate/Sessions Court (main case)

Conclusion on CrPC Section 457

CrPC Section 457 is essential for ensuring that property seized during criminal investigations is properly documented and preserved. It protects the rights of individuals by requiring police to prepare a detailed panchnama and obtain signatures, thus promoting transparency and accountability.

This section supports the integrity of the criminal justice process by preventing loss or tampering of evidence. Citizens and police alike benefit from clear procedures that uphold fairness and legal safeguards during property seizure.

FAQs on CrPC Section 457

What is a panchnama under Section 457?

A panchnama is a written inventory prepared by police when they take possession of property. It describes the property and is signed by the owner or two witnesses to ensure proper documentation.

Who must sign the panchnama?

The person from whom the property is taken must sign. If absent, at least two independent witnesses must sign to confirm the seizure and description of the property.

Why are two copies of the panchnama prepared?

Two copies ensure transparency: one copy is given to the person from whom property is taken, and the other is kept by the police as official record.

Does Section 457 apply to digital evidence?

Yes, the section applies to all property seized, including digital devices and data, requiring proper documentation and custody during investigations.

What happens if police fail to prepare a panchnama?

Failure to prepare a panchnama can lead to evidence being challenged or excluded in court, as it violates procedural safeguards meant to protect rights and evidence integrity.

Related Sections

Understand the legality of CCCAM in India, its use, restrictions, and enforcement related to satellite TV sharing.

In India, the legal age for most major rights is 18, with 17-year-olds facing restrictions and limited legal capacity.

Companies Act 2013 Section 243 governs the appointment and powers of inspectors for company investigations.

Being lesbian is legal in India, with no laws criminalizing same-sex female relationships, though social acceptance varies widely.

CrPC Section 87 empowers police to seize property connected to an offence to aid investigation and prevent misuse.

Companies Act 2013 Section 241 addresses oppression and mismanagement remedies for shareholders and stakeholders.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 265 deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions under the Act.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 43 defines the admissibility of expert opinion to assist courts in understanding technical or specialized facts.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 80L provides deductions for profits of certain undertakings in specified backward areas.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 76 outlines the penalties for unfair trade practices to protect consumers from exploitation.

Income Tax Act Section 294 deals with penalties for failure to comply with TDS provisions under the Act.

X Fantasy.Tv is conditionally legal in India, subject to strict regulations under gambling and IT laws.

DRL lights are conditionally legal in India, allowed only if they meet specific standards under the Motor Vehicle Act and AIS regulations.

Section 194R of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates TDS on benefits or perquisites provided by a business or profession in India.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 87 provides relief for double taxation to avoid taxing the same income twice.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 65 deals with the admissibility of secondary evidence when original documents are unavailable.

IPC Section 115 defines the offence of abetment of culpable homicide not amounting to murder, outlining its scope and punishment.

IPC Section 151 empowers police to arrest without warrant to prevent a breach of peace or disturbance of public tranquility.

Section 206F of the Income Tax Act 1961 mandates tax deduction at source on payments to non-filers of income tax returns in India.

Fog lamps on motorcycles are conditionally legal in India with specific restrictions under motor vehicle laws.

Euro USD trade is legal in India under RBI regulations with specific guidelines and restrictions for forex transactions.

Cigarette vending machines are illegal in India due to strict tobacco control laws and public health regulations.

Twitter operates in India under legal regulations but does not have special legal sanction for Indian government purposes.

CrPC Section 483 outlines the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

In India, kissing in a car is not explicitly illegal but may attract legal issues under public decency laws.

Contract Act 1872 Section 29 defines the legality of agreements, prohibiting contracts with unlawful consideration or objects.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(32) defines 'deficiency' in services, crucial for consumer rights and complaint resolution.

bottom of page