top of page

CrPC Section 388

CrPC Section 388 empowers courts to order investigation or inquiry into offences to ensure justice is served.

CrPC Section 388 provides courts the authority to direct the police or any other agency to investigate or inquire into an offence. This power is crucial when the court believes that an investigation is necessary to uncover facts or evidence for a fair trial. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal practitioners know how courts can actively ensure justice through ordered investigations.

This section plays a vital procedural role by enabling courts to intervene and order investigations even if the police have not initiated one. It ensures that no offence goes uninvestigated when the court deems it essential, thereby strengthening the criminal justice system's effectiveness.

CrPC Section 388 – Exact Provision

This provision grants courts discretionary power to order investigations or inquiries into offences when they consider it necessary. It is not limited to police officers; courts may appoint other persons to conduct inquiries. This flexibility ensures that investigations are thorough and impartial, aiding in uncovering the truth and facilitating justice.

  • Courts can order investigations or inquiries into offences.

  • Orders can be given to police or other appointed persons.

  • Applies when the court believes investigation is necessary.

  • Ensures no offence remains uninvestigated if justice demands.

Explanation of CrPC Section 388

Simply put, this section lets courts tell the police or others to investigate a crime if the court thinks it’s needed. It helps courts make sure all facts come out for fair decisions.

  • The section says courts can order investigations or inquiries.

  • Affects courts, police, and sometimes other appointed persons.

  • Triggered when the court believes an investigation is necessary.

  • Court can direct who should conduct the investigation.

  • Does not allow courts to conduct investigations themselves.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 388

This section exists to empower courts to actively ensure that offences are properly investigated. It prevents situations where police may delay or avoid investigations. By allowing courts to order inquiries, it protects the rights of victims and accused, ensuring justice is not compromised due to lack of investigation.

  • Protects citizens’ right to a fair investigation.

  • Ensures proper procedure in criminal cases.

  • Balances police discretion with judicial oversight.

  • Prevents abuse or neglect of investigation duties.

When CrPC Section 388 Applies

The section applies when a court, during any stage of a case, feels that an investigation or inquiry is necessary to reveal facts or evidence. It can be used in both ongoing and new cases to ensure justice.

  • Court must believe investigation is required.

  • Applicable at any stage of trial or inquiry.

  • Court has authority to appoint investigating officer or person.

  • No strict time limits, depends on court’s discretion.

  • Not limited to police; other persons can be appointed.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 388

Cognizance under this section occurs when a court identifies the need for an investigation or inquiry into an offence. The court then issues an order directing the police or another person to conduct the investigation. This power is exercised independently of police initiation and can be invoked suo motu or on application.

  • Court takes cognizance based on case facts or complaints.

  • Issues direction for investigation or inquiry.

  • Monitors progress and can modify or revoke orders.

Bailability under CrPC Section 388

Section 388 itself does not deal with bailability as it concerns court-ordered investigations. However, the nature of the offence under investigation determines bail conditions. The section facilitates investigation but does not affect bail rights directly.

  • Bail depends on the offence under inquiry.

  • Section 388 does not restrict or grant bail.

  • Investigation ordered may influence bail decisions indirectly.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 388)

Orders under Section 388 can be passed by any court that has jurisdiction over the offence or case. This includes Magistrate courts and Sessions courts depending on the nature of the offence and stage of trial.

  • Any court handling the case can invoke Section 388.

  • Magistrate or Sessions court may order investigations.

  • Applicable during trial, inquiry, or even pre-trial stages.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 388

Decisions under Section 388 can be challenged through appeals or revisions in higher courts. The hierarchy typically starts with the Sessions Court or High Court depending on the original court’s level. Timelines for appeal depend on the nature of the order and procedural rules.

  • Appeal lies to higher courts against orders under Section 388.

  • Revision petitions can be filed for procedural errors.

  • Timelines depend on specific court rules and urgency.

Example of CrPC Section 388 in Practical Use

Person X files a complaint alleging a serious offence, but the local police have not started an investigation. The Magistrate, suspecting the complaint’s validity, uses Section 388 to order a senior officer to investigate. This ensures the complaint is properly examined and evidence collected, protecting X’s rights and aiding justice.

  • Section 388 ensured investigation despite police inaction.

  • Key takeaway: courts can actively safeguard justice through ordered inquiries.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 388

Section 388 has evolved to strengthen judicial oversight over investigations. Initially, police had wide discretion, but amendments empowered courts to ensure investigations are not neglected. This change improved accountability and fairness in criminal proceedings.

  • Introduced to check police discretion.

  • Amended to allow courts to appoint non-police investigators.

  • Enhanced judicial control over criminal investigations.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 388

In 2026, Section 388 remains vital for ensuring timely and impartial investigations. With increasing awareness of rights and technology, courts use this power to direct investigations that are fair and thorough, balancing police authority and citizen protection.

  • Supports transparency and accountability in investigations.

  • Allows courts to address police delays or bias.

  • Facilitates justice in complex or sensitive cases.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 388

  • Section 156 – Police to investigate cognizable cases

  • Section 190 – Cognizance of offences by Magistrate

  • Section 202 – Postponement of issue of process

  • Section 173 – Report of police officer on completion of investigation

  • Section 195 – Prosecution for offences against public justice

Case References under CrPC Section 388

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Court’s power under Section 388 to order investigation upheld to ensure justice.

  2. R.K. Garg v. Union of India (1981, AIR 1981 SC 1118)

    – Emphasized judicial oversight in directing investigations under Section 388.

  3. K.K. Verma v. Union of India (1973, AIR 1973 SC 1193)

    – Clarified scope of court’s power to appoint investigating officers.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 388

  • Section:

    388

  • Title:

    Court’s Power to Order Investigation

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Courts, Police, Investigating Officers

  • Cognizance:

    Court takes cognizance and orders investigation

  • Bailability:

    Not applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate or Sessions Court

Conclusion on CrPC Section 388

CrPC Section 388 is a crucial provision that empowers courts to ensure that investigations into offences are conducted when necessary. It acts as a safeguard against police inaction or negligence, allowing judicial intervention to uphold justice. This section strengthens the criminal justice system by promoting thorough fact-finding.

For citizens, understanding Section 388 means knowing that courts can actively protect their rights by ordering investigations. It balances police powers with judicial oversight, ensuring fairness and accountability in criminal proceedings. Overall, Section 388 plays a vital role in maintaining the integrity of the legal process.

FAQs on CrPC Section 388

What does CrPC Section 388 empower the court to do?

It empowers courts to order an investigation or inquiry into an offence by police or any other person when the court believes it is necessary for justice.

Can courts appoint persons other than police to investigate under Section 388?

Yes, courts can direct investigations by police or any other person they consider fit, providing flexibility in conducting inquiries.

Does Section 388 affect bail rights?

No, Section 388 relates only to ordering investigations and does not directly impact bail, which depends on the offence involved.

Who can invoke Section 388?

Any court handling a criminal case can invoke Section 388 when it deems an investigation or inquiry necessary.

Is there a time limit for courts to order investigations under Section 388?

No specific time limit exists; courts may order investigations at any stage of the case based on necessity.

Related Sections

Section 187 of the Income Tax Act 1961 governs the service of notices and documents for income tax proceedings in India.

Promoting religion in India is legal with restrictions to maintain public order and secularism under the Constitution.

CrPC Section 105A details the procedure for police to record information about missing persons and initiate inquiries.

Due date SMS reminders are legal in India if they comply with IT and telecom regulations and respect user consent.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 69 covering inspection, search, and seizure provisions under GST law.

Understand the legal status of Perfect Money in India, including regulations, restrictions, and enforcement realities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 381 details the power to compound offences under the Act by the Registrar or other authorized officers.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 12 defines the relevancy of admissions, crucial for proving facts by statements against interest in civil and criminal cases.

IqOption Wallet is not legally recognized in India; trading or using it involves risks under Indian law.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 247 empowers the Commissioner to grant stay of demand during appeal proceedings.

Baofeng radios are generally legal in India with restrictions on frequencies and licenses required for certain uses.

Halal meat is legal in India with regulations ensuring proper slaughter methods and labeling for consumer rights.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 67 deals with the exclusion of oral evidence to contradict or vary written contracts, ensuring written agreements are upheld.

Polyandry is illegal in India under current personal and criminal laws with no legal exceptions.

In India, bloggers can legally receive donations with certain regulations and tax rules to follow.

CrPC Section 184 empowers magistrates to issue search warrants to prevent offences or recover stolen property.

Companies Act 2013 Section 181 governs the restrictions on political contributions by companies in India.

In India, having an affair after marriage is not illegal but can have legal consequences in divorce and maintenance cases.

In India, prostitution is not illegal, but laws regulate activities; transgender persons face similar legal conditions with unique social challenges.

Pork is legal to eat and sell in India, with cultural and regional variations affecting its consumption and availability.

Understand the legal status of online cricket betting sites in India, including laws, exceptions, and enforcement realities.

Companies Act 2013 Section 419 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Atheists are legally recognized as a minority in India with constitutional protections and freedom of belief.

Understand the legality and rules of depositions in India, including how they differ from other countries and their role in Indian legal proceedings.

Income Tax Act Section 54GA provides capital gains exemption for transfer of industrial undertakings to notified areas.

CPC Section 145 details the procedure for the arrest of a judgment-debtor in civil suits to enforce decrees.

Companies Act 2013 Section 467 defines the term 'subsidiary company' and its implications under Indian corporate law.

bottom of page