top of page

Information Technology Act 2000 Section 42

IT Act Section 42 defines the power to intercept, monitor, and decrypt digital information for lawful investigation.

Section 42 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, empowers authorised government agencies to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital information in the interest of sovereignty, security, or public order. This provision is crucial for investigating cybercrimes and maintaining national security in the digital age.

In today's interconnected world, digital communication is widespread. Section 42 ensures that law enforcement and intelligence agencies can access necessary digital data legally to prevent and investigate offences. It balances privacy concerns with the need for security, impacting users, businesses, and authorities alike.

Information Technology Act Section 42 – Exact Provision

This section authorises interception and monitoring of digital information by government agencies under strict conditions. It applies to any data stored or transmitted via computer resources. The provision is a legal tool to combat cyber threats while safeguarding national interests.

  • Authorises government interception of digital data.

  • Applies to information in any computer resource.

  • Limited to interests like sovereignty, security, and public order.

  • Requires authorisation by the Central Government.

  • Supports lawful investigation and intelligence gathering.

Explanation of Information Technology Act Section 42

Section 42 allows authorised officials to access digital information under specific conditions. It applies to government officers, intelligence agencies, and law enforcement.

  • States the power to intercept, monitor, or decrypt digital data.

  • Applies to any person or entity handling computer resources.

  • Triggered when national security or public order is at risk.

  • Legal criteria include authorisation by Central Government.

  • Allows lawful access; prohibits unauthorised interception.

Purpose and Rationale of IT Act Section 42

This section aims to protect the nation from cyber threats by enabling lawful surveillance of digital communications. It balances individual privacy with the need for security.

  • Protects sovereignty and integrity of India.

  • Prevents cyberterrorism and cyber espionage.

  • Ensures secure digital environment.

  • Regulates lawful interception and monitoring.

When IT Act Section 42 Applies

Section 42 applies when digital information poses a threat to national security or public order. It is invoked by authorised government officers.

  • When interception is necessary for security reasons.

  • Authorised by Central Government or designated officers.

  • Requires evidence of threat or offence.

  • Applies to digital data in any computer resource.

  • Exceptions include lawful privacy protections and judicial oversight.

Legal Effect of IT Act Section 42

This section creates the legal framework for government interception of digital data. It restricts unauthorised access while enabling lawful investigation. Penalties apply for misuse.

Individuals and companies must comply with lawful orders. Platforms may be required to assist. The section complements IPC provisions on security offences.

  • Creates lawful interception rights for government.

  • Restricts unauthorised digital surveillance.

  • Penalties for violation include imprisonment and fines.

Nature of Offence or Liability under IT Act Section 42

Section 42 itself does not define an offence but authorises lawful interception. Misuse or unauthorised interception may attract criminal liability under other provisions.

  • Authorises regulatory compliance by government agencies.

  • Unauthorised interception is punishable under IT Act.

  • Offence is cognizable and non-bailable.

  • Arrest may require warrant depending on circumstances.

Stage of Proceedings Where IT Act Section 42 Applies

This section is relevant during investigation and evidence collection stages. It enables gathering digital evidence legally before trial.

  • Investigation by authorised officers.

  • Collection of intercepted digital data and metadata.

  • Filing of complaint or charge sheet with evidence.

  • Use of intercepted data during trial proceedings.

  • Appeal on legality of interception may arise.

Penalties and Consequences under IT Act Section 42

While Section 42 authorises interception, misuse or unauthorised acts attract penalties under related IT Act provisions. Penalties include fines and imprisonment.

  • Fines for unauthorised interception.

  • Imprisonment up to three years or more.

  • Corporate liability if companies fail to comply.

  • Intermediary liability to assist lawful interception.

  • Compensation claims for privacy violations.

Example of IT Act Section 42 in Practical Use

X, an intelligence officer, receives authorisation from the Central Government to intercept digital communications of a suspected cyberterrorist. Using Section 42, X legally monitors encrypted messages, decrypts them, and gathers evidence to prevent a planned attack. This lawful interception enables timely action, safeguarding public security.

  • Authorised interception aids in preventing cyber threats.

  • Ensures evidence is collected legally and admissibly.

Historical Background of IT Act Section 42

The IT Act was introduced in 2000 to regulate electronic commerce and combat cybercrime. Section 42 was included to empower lawful interception in the digital realm. The 2008 Amendment Act expanded provisions for cyber offences and surveillance.

  • Introduced to address emerging cyber threats.

  • Amended in 2008 to strengthen interception powers.

  • Interpreted alongside telecom and security laws.

Modern Relevance of IT Act Section 42

In 2026, cybersecurity and data protection are critical. Section 42 remains vital for lawful surveillance amid rising cybercrime, fintech growth, and digital identity use. It supports enforcement while balancing privacy concerns.

  • Supports collection of digital evidence.

  • Ensures online safety and national security.

  • Challenges include encryption and privacy laws.

Related Sections

  • IT Act Section 43 – Penalty for unauthorised access and data theft.

  • IT Act Section 66 – Computer-related offences.

  • IT Act Section 69 – Powers to issue directions for interception or monitoring.

  • IPC Section 120B – Criminal conspiracy, relevant in cybercrime.

  • Evidence Act Section 65B – Admissibility of electronic evidence.

  • CrPC Section 91 – Summons for digital records or documents.

Case References under IT Act Section 42

No landmark case directly interprets this section as of 2026.

Key Facts Summary for IT Act Section 42

  • Section:

    42

  • Title:

    Interception and Monitoring Powers

  • Category:

    Cybersecurity, Surveillance, Regulation

  • Applies To:

    Government agencies, authorised officers

  • Stage:

    Investigation, evidence collection

  • Legal Effect:

    Authorises lawful interception, restricts unauthorised access

  • Penalties:

    Fines, imprisonment for misuse

Conclusion on IT Act Section 42

Section 42 is a cornerstone provision empowering the government to intercept and monitor digital communications lawfully. It plays a critical role in safeguarding national security and public order in an era dominated by digital data.

While it enables effective investigation of cyber threats, the section also demands strict adherence to legal authorisation to protect individual privacy. Balancing security and privacy remains a key challenge for authorities and citizens alike.

FAQs on IT Act Section 42

What authorisation is required under Section 42 for interception?

Interception under Section 42 requires authorisation from the Central Government or an officer authorised by it. This ensures lawful and controlled access to digital information for security purposes.

Does Section 42 apply to private companies?

Section 42 primarily empowers government agencies. However, private companies may be required to assist lawful interception when directed by authorised officers.

Can Section 42 be used for any digital data?

Yes, it applies to any information generated, transmitted, received, or stored in any computer resource, subject to legal authorisation and purpose.

What happens if someone intercepts data without authorisation?

Unauthorised interception is illegal and punishable under the IT Act, including fines and imprisonment, to protect privacy and data security.

How does Section 42 relate to privacy rights?

Section 42 balances national security needs with privacy by requiring strict authorisation and limiting interception to specific interests like sovereignty and public order.

Related Sections

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 73 details penalties for non-compliance with orders by Consumer Commissions, ensuring enforcement of consumer rights.

IPC Section 380 defines theft in a dwelling house, emphasizing protection of homes from burglary and theft.

CrPC Section 439A details the procedure for granting bail to accused persons in cases involving offences punishable with death or life imprisonment.

CrPC Section 215 empowers courts to summon persons to produce documents or other things relevant to a case.

Companies Act 2013 Section 186 regulates loans, guarantees, and investments by companies to ensure transparency and protect stakeholders.

IPC Section 227 defines the procedure for discharge of an accused when evidence is insufficient to proceed to trial.

IPC Section 177 defines punishment for knowingly disobeying an order lawfully promulgated by a public servant.

CrPC Section 204 details the magistrate's duty to take cognizance of offences upon receiving a complaint or police report.

IPC Section 454 defines house trespass in order to commit an offence, focusing on unlawful entry with criminal intent.

CrPC Section 49 details the procedure for arresting a person without a warrant and the necessity of informing them of the grounds of arrest.

CPC Section 7 defines the extent of civil court jurisdiction and when it can refuse to try a suit.

Companies Act 2013 Section 23 governs the alteration of the memorandum of association of a company.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 88 protects official communications from being disclosed without authority, ensuring confidentiality in public service.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 9 outlines the jurisdiction of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions for consumer complaints.

CrPC Section 347 defines the procedure when a Magistrate refuses to take cognizance of an offence.

CrPC Section 152 mandates police officers to register an FIR upon receiving information about a cognizable offence.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 2 defines 'evidence' including oral, documentary, and electronic forms crucial for proving facts in legal proceedings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 181 governs the restrictions on political contributions by companies in India.

CrPC Section 164 details the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a Magistrate to ensure legality and voluntariness.

Companies Act 2013 Section 26 governs alteration of memorandum of association by companies in India.

CrPC Section 437A details the procedure for granting bail to accused during trial for offences punishable with imprisonment up to seven years.

IPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume certain facts based on common experience and reason when direct evidence is absent.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 144 details the admissibility of evidence regarding the existence of a custom or usage in courts.

CrPC Section 420 defines the offence of cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property under Indian law.

CrPC Section 20 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India based on where offences occur.

CPC Section 10 prevents courts from trying suits that are already pending between the same parties on the same matter.

Contract Act 1872 Section 55 explains the consequences of breach of contract and remedies available to the aggrieved party.

bottom of page