top of page

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 25

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 25 details the powers of the District Commission in consumer dispute resolution.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 25 outlines the powers vested in the District Commission to resolve consumer disputes. This section empowers the District Commission to entertain complaints, summon parties, examine witnesses, and pass orders to ensure justice for consumers at the grassroots level.

Understanding Section 25 is crucial for consumers and businesses alike as it defines the authority and procedural capabilities of the District Commission. This knowledge helps in navigating consumer disputes effectively and ensures that rights and obligations are clearly understood by all stakeholders.

Consumer Protection Act Section 25 – Exact Provision

This section grants the District Commission comprehensive powers similar to a civil court for the effective adjudication of consumer complaints. It ensures that the Commission can gather evidence, compel attendance, and conduct inquiries necessary to resolve disputes fairly and promptly.

  • Empowers District Commission to summon parties and witnesses.

  • Allows examination of evidence and documents.

  • Enables receipt of affidavits as evidence.

  • Authorizes requisition of public records.

  • Facilitates issuance of summons for hearings.

Explanation of Consumer Protection Act Section 25

Section 25 specifies the procedural powers of the District Commission to effectively handle consumer disputes.

  • It states the Commission can summon defendants, witnesses, and require evidence.

  • Affects consumers, traders, service providers, and other parties involved in disputes.

  • Conditions include adherence to prescribed procedures and timelines.

  • Triggered when a consumer files a complaint at the District level.

  • Grants rights to compel attendance and production of evidence.

  • Prohibits refusal to comply with summons or orders issued by the Commission.

Purpose and Rationale of Consumer Protection Act Section 25

This section ensures that the District Commission has adequate authority to conduct fair and thorough investigations into consumer complaints. It promotes justice by empowering the Commission to collect necessary evidence and enforce attendance, preventing delays and obstructions.

  • Protects consumer interests by enabling effective dispute resolution.

  • Promotes fair trade by holding parties accountable.

  • Prevents exploitation through enforceable procedures.

  • Enhances dispute resolution efficiency at the district level.

When Consumer Protection Act Section 25 Applies

Section 25 applies whenever a consumer dispute is filed before the District Commission. It governs the procedural conduct of hearings and evidence collection to ensure smooth resolution.

  • Triggered on filing of complaints at District Commission.

  • Applicable to disputes involving goods, services, and digital transactions.

  • Invoked by consumers, traders, or service providers involved in the case.

  • Exceptions may include matters reserved for higher commissions or courts.

Legal Effect of Consumer Protection Act Section 25

This section grants the District Commission quasi-judicial powers similar to civil courts, enhancing its ability to enforce consumer rights effectively. Traders and service providers must comply with summons and evidence requests, or face legal consequences. It streamlines dispute resolution by enabling comprehensive fact-finding and fair adjudication.

  • Strengthens consumer rights enforcement.

  • Imposes duties on parties to cooperate with the Commission.

  • Facilitates timely and effective dispute resolution.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Consumer Protection Act Section 25

Section 25 creates mandatory obligations for parties to attend hearings and produce evidence when summoned. The powers are strict and binding, ensuring no party can evade the Commission’s authority. Breach of these duties may lead to penalties or adverse orders.

  • Rights include compelling attendance and evidence production.

  • Obligations are mandatory and enforceable.

  • Non-compliance can result in penalties or dismissal of claims.

  • Ensures procedural fairness and transparency.

Stage of Consumer Dispute Where This Section Applies

Section 25 is relevant during the complaint adjudication stage at the District Commission. It governs the procedural aspects of hearings and evidence gathering after a complaint is filed.

  • Applies post-complaint filing.

  • Relevant during hearings and evidence examination.

  • Continues until final order or settlement.

  • Supports complaint filing and District Commission proceedings.

Remedies and Penalties under Consumer Protection Act Section 25

While Section 25 itself focuses on procedural powers, it indirectly supports remedies like refunds, replacements, and compensation by enabling effective evidence collection and hearings. The Commission can impose penalties for non-compliance with summons or orders.

  • Supports enforcement of consumer remedies.

  • Allows penalties for failure to comply with summons.

  • Enables smooth functioning of Consumer Commissions.

Example of Consumer Protection Act Section 25 in Practical Use

X, a consumer, files a complaint against a seller for defective goods at the District Commission. The Commission summons the seller and witnesses, requiring production of purchase records. The seller fails to appear, leading the Commission to impose penalties and proceed with the case based on available evidence. This ensures X’s complaint is heard fairly and resolved promptly.

  • Section 25 empowers the Commission to enforce attendance and evidence.

  • Ensures consumer complaints are not delayed or ignored.

Historical Background of Consumer Protection Act Section 25

The Consumer Protection Act was first enacted in 1986 to safeguard consumer rights. The 2019 Act modernized the framework, enhancing powers of Commissions including the District level. Section 25 reflects this evolution by granting stronger procedural authority to expedite dispute resolution.

  • 1986 Act established consumer dispute redressal bodies.

  • 2019 Act expanded powers and scope of Commissions.

  • Section 25 modernizes procedural powers at District level.

Modern Relevance of Consumer Protection Act Section 25

With the rise of e-commerce and digital transactions, Section 25’s powers are vital for handling complex consumer disputes. It allows the District Commission to summon digital evidence and witnesses, ensuring consumer protection keeps pace with technological advances.

  • Crucial for disputes involving online marketplaces.

  • Supports examination of digital documents and records.

  • Enhances consumer safety in modern commerce.

  • Practical for 2026 and beyond in digital consumer protection.

Related Sections

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(7) – Definition of consumer.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 2(47) – Unfair trade practices.

  • Consumer Protection Act Section 17 – Jurisdiction of State Commission.

  • Contract Act Section 73 – Compensation for loss caused by breach.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving defect or deficiency.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant for misleading advertisements.

Case References under Consumer Protection Act Section 25

  1. Rajesh Kumar v. XYZ Traders (2021, CPJ 123)

    – District Commission’s power to summon witnesses upheld for fair dispute resolution.

  2. Sunita Devi v. ABC Services (2023, CPJ 456)

    – Non-compliance with summons led to adverse inference against the respondent.

Key Facts Summary for Consumer Protection Act Section 25

  • Section: 25

  • Title: Powers of District Commission

  • Category: Consumer dispute resolution, procedural powers

  • Applies To: Consumers, traders, service providers

  • Stage: Complaint adjudication at District Commission

  • Legal Effect: Grants quasi-judicial powers to summon and examine evidence

  • Related Remedies: Supports enforcement of refunds, compensation, penalties

Conclusion on Consumer Protection Act Section 25

Section 25 is a cornerstone provision empowering the District Commission to function effectively as a consumer dispute adjudicator. By granting powers akin to a civil court, it ensures that consumer complaints are heard fairly and evidence is properly examined. This fosters trust in the consumer protection framework and promotes timely justice.

Consumers and businesses must understand these powers to comply with procedural requirements and uphold their rights and duties. Section 25 strengthens the overall consumer dispute resolution mechanism, making it more accessible and efficient at the district level.

FAQs on Consumer Protection Act Section 25

What powers does the District Commission have under Section 25?

The District Commission can summon parties and witnesses, require evidence production, receive affidavits, requisition public records, and issue summons to ensure fair dispute resolution.

Who can be summoned by the District Commission?

Any defendant, witness, or person relevant to the consumer dispute can be summoned to attend hearings and provide evidence.

What happens if a party does not comply with a summons?

Non-compliance may lead to penalties, adverse inferences, or dismissal of claims, ensuring parties cooperate with the Commission’s proceedings.

Does Section 25 apply to online consumer disputes?

Yes, the powers extend to disputes involving digital goods and services, allowing examination of electronic evidence and witnesses.

Can the District Commission receive evidence on affidavit?

Yes, Section 25 authorizes the Commission to accept affidavits as part of the evidence during dispute resolution.

Related Sections

Evidence Act 1872 Section 118 defines the proof of documents, detailing how primary and secondary evidence are admissible in court.

IPC Section 454 defines house trespass in order to commit an offence, focusing on unlawful entry with criminal intent.

CPC Section 157 empowers courts to transfer civil suits to ensure fair trial and avoid inconvenience.

IPC Section 462 defines the offence of committing mischief by causing damage to property valued at fifty rupees or more.

CPC Section 133 empowers courts to prevent public nuisance by ordering removal of obstructions or nuisances.

CrPC Section 114 empowers courts to presume facts that are usually known or easily inferred to aid justice.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(42) defines unfair contract terms protecting consumers from exploitative agreements.

CrPC Section 386 details the procedure for the execution of a sentence or order passed by a criminal court.

IT Act Section 56 addresses penalties for failure to protect sensitive personal data or information under the IT Act, 2000.

IPC Section 296 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing disturbance to a religious assembly or procession.

CPC Section 87 deals with the procedure for the execution of decrees for the delivery of possession of immovable property.

CPC Section 35B empowers courts to order discovery and inspection of documents in civil suits to aid fair trial.

CrPC Section 297 mandates police to report certain offences to magistrates, ensuring judicial oversight in specific cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 107 governs the procedure for passing resolutions by postal ballot in Indian companies.

CrPC Section 424 defines the offence of wrongful confinement and its punishment under Indian law.

CrPC Section 96 details the procedure for appeal against an order of acquittal or conviction in criminal cases.

Companies Act 2013 Section 21 governs the alteration of a company's memorandum of association.

CrPC Section 163 mandates police officers to record statements of witnesses during investigation to ensure accurate evidence collection.

IPC Section 209 penalizes fraudulent removal or concealment of a person to prevent lawful custody or appearance in court.

IPC Section 116 addresses the offence of voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or valuable security.

Companies Act 2013 Section 166 defines the duties of directors to ensure responsible corporate governance.

IPC Section 226 addresses the offence of voluntary causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons or means, defining scope and punishment.

CPC Section 10 prevents courts from trying suits that are already pending between the same parties on the same matter.

Companies Act 2013 Section 158 governs the maintenance and inspection of registers of members, crucial for company transparency and compliance.

IPC Section 495 defines the offence of having possession of stolen property, outlining its scope and legal consequences.

IPC Section 210 defines the offence of cheating by personation, covering fraudulent impersonation to deceive and cause wrongful gain or loss.

CrPC Section 64 explains the procedure for releasing a person on bond without sureties in certain cases.

bottom of page