top of page

Contract Act 1872 Section 75

Contract Act 1872 Section 75 explains when a party can recover money paid under a void agreement.

Contract Act Section 75 deals with the recovery of money paid under agreements that are declared void. It allows a party who has paid money under such an agreement to reclaim it, ensuring fairness when a contract fails to create legal obligations.

This provision is crucial in commercial transactions to prevent unjust enrichment and protect parties from financial loss due to invalid contracts. Understanding Section 75 helps businesses and individuals safeguard their interests when agreements do not hold legal force.

Contract Act Section 75 – Exact Provision

This section ensures that if a contract is void, any benefits or money received under it must be returned or compensated. It prevents one party from unfairly benefiting at the expense of another when the contract has no legal effect.

  • Allows recovery of money or benefits paid under a void agreement.

  • Prevents unjust enrichment of the receiving party.

  • Applies only when the agreement is void, not voidable.

  • Ensures fairness in failed contractual dealings.

Explanation of Contract Act Section 75

Section 75 states that when an agreement is void, any advantage received must be restored or compensated.

  • The section applies when the agreement is void from the start.

  • It affects parties who have paid money or transferred benefits under such agreements.

  • Legal requirement: the agreement must be void, not merely voidable.

  • Triggering event: discovery or declaration of the agreement’s void status.

  • Validates claims for restitution to prevent unjust enrichment.

Purpose and Rationale of Contract Act Section 75

This section aims to uphold fairness by ensuring no party benefits from a contract that is legally void. It protects parties from losing money or property when agreements fail to create enforceable obligations.

  • Protects contractual fairness by preventing unjust enrichment.

  • Ensures restoration of benefits received under void agreements.

  • Maintains trust and equity in commercial dealings.

  • Supports legal certainty by clarifying consequences of void contracts.

When Contract Act Section 75 Applies

Section 75 applies when an agreement is declared void, and a party has received money or benefits under it. It can be invoked by the party who paid or transferred the advantage.

  • Condition: agreement must be void, not voidable.

  • Either party may invoke the section to recover benefits.

  • Applies to contracts involving money, goods, or other advantages.

  • Scope limited to restoration or compensation of received benefits.

  • Exceptions include agreements valid at the time or ratified later.

Legal Effect of Contract Act Section 75

Section 75 affects the enforceability of contracts by allowing recovery of money or benefits paid under void agreements. It does not validate the contract but provides remedies to prevent unjust enrichment. This section complements Sections 10 to 30 by addressing consequences when contracts lack validity.

  • Allows restitution but does not create contract validity.

  • Supports remedies for parties affected by void contracts.

  • Interacts with free consent and lawful object provisions indirectly.

Nature of Rights and Obligations under Contract Act Section 75

The section creates a right to recover money or benefits paid under a void agreement. It imposes an obligation on the receiving party to restore or compensate. These duties are mandatory to ensure fairness. Failure to comply may lead to legal action for recovery.

  • Right to restitution for the paying party.

  • Mandatory obligation on the recipient to restore benefits.

  • Non-performance can result in claims for compensation.

  • Obligations arise only when the agreement is void.

Stage of Transaction Where Contract Act Section 75 Applies

Section 75 applies after the contract is found void, typically post-formation or upon discovery of invalidity. It concerns the recovery stage rather than contract formation or performance.

  • Applies after contract formation when void status is established.

  • Relevant during breach or invalidity discovery.

  • Focuses on remedy and enforcement stages.

  • Does not affect pre-contract negotiations or contract execution.

Remedies and Legal Consequences under Contract Act Section 75

Parties can sue to recover money or benefits paid under void agreements. Remedies include restitution, compensation, and sometimes damages. The contract remains void, but the section ensures no party is unjustly enriched.

  • Right to sue for recovery of money or benefits.

  • Compensation may be awarded if restoration is impossible.

  • Does not validate the void contract.

  • Supports equitable remedies to prevent loss.

Example of Contract Act Section 75 in Practical Use

Person X paid Rs. 50,000 to Person Y under a contract later declared void due to illegality. Under Section 75, X can demand Y to return the Rs. 50,000 or compensate for it. This prevents Y from unfairly keeping money without a valid contract.

  • Ensures recovery of money paid under void contracts.

  • Protects parties from financial loss due to invalid agreements.

Historical Background of Contract Act Section 75

Section 75 was introduced to address situations where contracts failed to create legal obligations but involved transfer of money or benefits. Courts historically applied it to prevent unjust enrichment and maintain fairness in contractual relations. Amendments have clarified its scope and application.

  • Created to prevent unjust enrichment from void contracts.

  • Historically applied to restore parties’ losses.

  • Amended to specify conditions and remedies.

Modern Relevance of Contract Act Section 75

In 2026, Section 75 remains vital for digital and e-commerce contracts that may be void due to non-compliance or fraud. It helps recover payments in online transactions and supports fairness in modern business practices.

  • Applies to digital transactions and e-payments.

  • Important for online contract disputes.

  • Supports commercial fairness in e-commerce.

Related Sections

  • Contract Act Section 2 – Definitions of contract terms.

  • Contract Act Section 10 – Requirements of a valid contract.

  • Contract Act Section 23 – Lawful consideration and object.

  • Contract Act Section 56 – Agreements in restraint of legal proceedings.

  • IPC Section 415 – Cheating, relevant where consent is obtained by deception.

  • Evidence Act Section 101 – Burden of proving contract terms.

Case References under Contract Act Section 75

  1. Union of India v. Raman Iron Foundry (1974, AIR 1590)

    – Recovery allowed when contract declared void due to illegality.

  2. R. S. Nayak v. A. R. Antulay (1984, AIR 684)

    – Emphasized restitution under void agreements to prevent unjust enrichment.

Key Facts Summary for Contract Act Section 75

  • Section: 75

  • Title: Recovery of Money Paid Under Void Agreement

  • Category: Remedies, Void Contracts, Restitution

  • Applies To: Parties to void agreements who have paid money or transferred benefits

  • Transaction Stage: Post-formation, upon discovery of void status

  • Legal Effect: Enables recovery of money/benefits, prevents unjust enrichment

  • Related Remedies: Restitution, compensation, legal claims for recovery

Conclusion on Contract Act Section 75

Contract Act Section 75 plays a crucial role in ensuring fairness when contracts are void. It protects parties from losing money or benefits by allowing recovery or compensation. This provision upholds justice and equity in contractual dealings, especially when agreements fail to create legal obligations.

Understanding Section 75 is essential for businesses and individuals to safeguard their financial interests. It complements other contract law provisions by addressing consequences of void agreements and preventing unjust enrichment in commercial transactions.

FAQs on Contract Act Section 75

What does Section 75 of the Contract Act cover?

Section 75 covers the recovery of money or benefits paid under agreements that are void. It ensures that parties can reclaim advantages transferred when a contract has no legal effect.

When can a party invoke Section 75?

A party can invoke Section 75 when an agreement is declared void and they have paid money or transferred benefits under it. The section allows them to recover those advantages.

Does Section 75 apply to voidable contracts?

No, Section 75 applies only to void agreements. Voidable contracts are valid until rescinded and do not fall under this section for recovery purposes.

What remedies are available under Section 75?

Remedies include restitution of money or benefits paid, compensation if restoration is impossible, and legal claims to prevent unjust enrichment of the receiving party.

How does Section 75 relate to other contract provisions?

Section 75 complements provisions on contract validity by addressing consequences when contracts are void. It ensures fairness alongside Sections 10 to 30, which define valid contract elements.

Related Sections

IPC Section 295A punishes deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings.

Companies Act 2013 Section 39 governs the issue of shares at a discount and related compliance requirements.

CPC Section 134 details the procedure for executing decrees against government property in civil suits.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 142 defines the term 'document' and its scope for admissibility in legal proceedings.

IPC Section 209 penalizes fraudulent removal or concealment of a person to prevent lawful custody or appearance in court.

IPC Section 496 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining liability and punishment for handling stolen goods knowingly.

CrPC Section 49 details the procedure for arresting a person without a warrant and the necessity of informing them of the grounds of arrest.

IPC Section 461 defines punishment for committing forgery of valuable security, will, or authority document.

Contract Act 1872 Section 50 explains when a contract becomes void due to impossibility of performance.

IPC Section 84 provides legal protection for acts committed by persons of unsound mind, exempting them from criminal liability.

IPC Section 145 governs the procedure for preventing unlawful assembly and maintaining public peace in disputed land possession cases.

CrPC Section 321 empowers a public prosecutor to withdraw from a case with court approval, ensuring efficient justice delivery.

IPC Section 368 defines the offence of causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 2(23) defines 'defect' in goods, crucial for consumer rights and product liability claims.

CrPC Section 99 details the procedure for issuing summons to witnesses to ensure their attendance in court.

IPC Section 302 defines punishment for murder, outlining legal consequences and scope of this grave offence.

IPC Section 91 empowers courts to compel attendance and production of documents to aid justice.

IPC Section 248 defines the offence of negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substances, focusing on public safety and prevention of harm.

IPC Section 477A penalizes the sale of noxious food or drink harmful to health, ensuring public safety and health protection.

IPC Section 52A defines 'Public Servant' and clarifies who is considered a public servant under Indian law.

IPC Section 483 defines the offence of making a false statement in a declaration which is legally required, ensuring truthfulness in official declarations.

CrPC Section 180 empowers police to disperse unlawful assemblies to maintain public order and safety.

CrPC Section 317 details the procedure for withdrawal of prosecution by the Public Prosecutor in criminal cases.

CPC Section 123 deals with the procedure for hearing and disposal of suits in the absence of parties.

CrPC Section 199 outlines the procedure for complaints to Magistrates about offences, ensuring proper initiation of legal action.

CrPC Section 367 details the procedure when a person accused of an offence absconds or cannot be found by the police.

CPC Section 92 empowers courts to order temporary injunctions to prevent harm during civil suits.

bottom of page