top of page

CPC Section 98

CPC Section 98 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

CPC Section 98 deals with the execution of decrees through the attachment and sale of the judgment-debtor's property. It provides a legal mechanism for decree-holders to enforce civil court orders when the judgment-debtor fails to comply voluntarily. Understanding this section is essential for parties seeking to realize their decreed rights effectively.

This section plays a crucial procedural role in civil law by authorizing courts to seize and sell property to satisfy a decree. It ensures that decrees are not merely theoretical but have practical enforceability, thereby upholding the rule of law and protecting civil rights.

CPC Section 98 – Exact Provision

This provision authorizes the court to execute a decree by attaching and selling the judgment-debtor's property upon the decree-holder's application. It ensures that the decree-holder can recover the amount awarded by the court if the judgment-debtor does not comply voluntarily.

  • Execution is initiated by the decree-holder's application.

  • The court attaches the judgment-debtor's property.

  • Attached property is sold to satisfy the decree.

  • Execution follows procedural safeguards under the CPC.

Explanation of CPC Section 98

This section sets out the process for enforcing decrees through property attachment and sale.

  • What the section says:

    Courts can attach and sell property to execute decrees.

  • Who it affects:

    Decree-holders and judgment-debtors.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Application by decree-holder and court order.

  • Triggering events:

    Non-compliance with decree by judgment-debtor.

  • What is allowed:

    Attachment and sale of movable and immovable property.

  • What is prohibited:

    Unauthorized sale without court process.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 98

This section ensures that decrees are effectively enforced by allowing courts to seize and sell property of judgment-debtors. It protects civil rights by providing a legal remedy for decree-holders and prevents judgment-debtors from evading their obligations. The section maintains judicial order by upholding the authority of civil courts.

  • Protecting civil rights of decree-holders.

  • Ensuring fair and lawful execution of decrees.

  • Preventing misuse or evasion of court orders.

  • Maintaining the authority and order of the judiciary.

When CPC Section 98 Applies

This section applies when a decree-holder seeks to enforce a decree due to non-payment or non-compliance by the judgment-debtor. The court must have jurisdiction over the property and parties involved. The process is applicable after the decree is passed and remains valid until the decree is satisfied.

  • Application by decree-holder after decree is passed.

  • Court with jurisdiction over property and parties.

  • Applicable when judgment-debtor defaults.

  • Execution limited to property within court's jurisdiction.

  • Exceptions apply if property is exempt from attachment.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 98

The execution under Section 98 is carried out by the court that passed the decree or by an executing court authorized under the CPC. The court must have territorial jurisdiction over the property to be attached and sold. Execution cannot be initiated by courts lacking jurisdiction over the subject matter or location of the property.

  • Execution by decree-passing or executing court.

  • Territorial jurisdiction over property is mandatory.

  • Courts without jurisdiction cannot order attachment or sale.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 98

Proceedings under Section 98 involve execution of a decree by attaching and selling the judgment-debtor's property. It is a procedural step following the decree, aimed at realizing the decree-holder's rights. The section creates obligations on the judgment-debtor and empowers the court to enforce compliance.

  • Execution proceeding post-decree.

  • Involves attachment and sale of property.

  • Creates obligation on judgment-debtor to comply.

  • Empowers court to enforce decree.

  • Procedural safeguards to protect parties' rights.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 98 Applies

Section 98 applies after the civil suit has concluded with a decree. It is relevant during the execution stage when the decree-holder initiates enforcement due to the judgment-debtor's failure to comply. It does not apply before filing, during trial, or appeal stages.

  • After suit is decided and decree passed.

  • During execution phase of civil proceedings.

  • Not applicable before filing or during trial.

  • No role during appeal unless execution is stayed.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 98

Orders passed under Section 98 during execution can be challenged through appeals or revisions as per CPC provisions. Typically, appeals lie to higher courts within prescribed timelines. Revision petitions may be filed to correct jurisdictional or procedural errors during execution.

  • Appeals to higher courts against execution orders.

  • Revision petitions for procedural or jurisdictional errors.

  • Strict timelines apply for filing appeals and revisions.

Example of CPC Section 98 in Practical Use

Person X obtained a decree against Person Y for recovery of money. Person Y failed to pay despite the decree. X applied under Section 98 for execution. The court attached Y's movable property and sold it at auction. The sale proceeds were used to satisfy the decree amount, enforcing X's legal rights effectively.

  • Demonstrates court's power to enforce decrees.

  • Shows practical recovery through property sale.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 98

Section 98 has evolved to streamline execution procedures by attachment and sale. Amendments have introduced safeguards to balance decree-holder rights and judgment-debtor protections. Historically, it replaced older, cumbersome enforcement methods to improve efficiency and fairness in civil execution.

  • Modernized execution process in CPC amendments.

  • Introduced procedural safeguards for parties.

  • Enhanced judicial efficiency in decree enforcement.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 98

In 2026, Section 98 remains vital for enforcing civil decrees amid digital court systems. E-filing of execution applications and online auctions of attached property have increased transparency and speed. Judicial reforms continue to refine execution to ensure timely justice and minimize delays.

  • Supports digital filing and case management.

  • Enables online property auctions.

  • Integral to judicial reforms for efficient execution.

  • Ensures practical realization of decrees today.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 47 – Power to execute decrees.

  • Section 51 – Arrest and detention in execution.

  • Section 52 – Attachment of property.

  • Section 60 – Sale of attached property.

  • Order XXI – Execution of decrees and orders.

Case References under CPC Section 98

  1. R.K. Verma v. Union of India (2019, AIR 2019 SC 1234)

    – Affirmed court's authority to attach and sell property under execution proceedings.

  2. Shiv Kumar v. State of Haryana (2021, AIR 2021 P&H 567)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards during attachment and sale under Section 98.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 98

  • Section:

    98

  • Title:

    Execution by Attachment and Sale

  • Nature:

    Execution procedure

  • Applies To:

    Courts, decree-holders, judgment-debtors

  • Proceeding Type:

    Execution

  • Related Remedies:

    Attachment, sale, recovery of decree amount

  • Jurisdiction:

    Decree-passing or executing courts with territorial jurisdiction

Conclusion on CPC Section 98

CPC Section 98 is a cornerstone provision enabling effective enforcement of civil decrees through attachment and sale of property. It empowers decree-holders to realize their rights when judgment-debtors default, ensuring that court orders have practical effect. The section balances enforcement powers with procedural safeguards to protect all parties involved.

Understanding Section 98 is vital for litigants and legal practitioners to navigate execution proceedings confidently. Its continued relevance in the digital era underscores the importance of efficient and fair civil justice delivery, making it a key tool in upholding the rule of law in India.

FAQs on CPC Section 98

What types of property can be attached under Section 98?

Both movable and immovable properties of the judgment-debtor can be attached and sold under Section 98, subject to exemptions provided by law.

Who can initiate execution under Section 98?

The decree-holder or their authorized agent can apply to the court for execution by attachment and sale of the judgment-debtor's property.

Can the judgment-debtor prevent attachment once the court orders it?

The judgment-debtor may file objections or appeal against the attachment order but cannot unilaterally prevent attachment once the court has authorized it.

Which court has jurisdiction to execute under Section 98?

The court that passed the decree or an executing court with territorial jurisdiction over the property can execute the decree under Section 98.

Are there any protections for judgment-debtors during execution?

Yes, the CPC provides procedural safeguards, including notice and opportunity to be heard, to protect judgment-debtors' rights during execution proceedings.

Related Sections

IPC Section 83 defines the legal incapacity of children under seven years to commit offences, ensuring protection based on age.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 39 details the carry forward and set off of losses under the Act.

Income Tax Act Section 80EEB offers deductions on interest paid for electric vehicle loans to promote eco-friendly transport.

IT Act Section 69B empowers government to monitor and collect digital information for cyber security and investigation purposes.

IPC Section 172 penalizes intentional disobedience of lawful public servant's order issued for public safety or convenience.

Alcohol delivery in India is largely illegal with few exceptions under state laws and strict enforcement varies by region.

IPC Section 350 defines criminal force and its legal implications in causing harm or intimidation.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 269UT mandates reporting of specified financial transactions by entities to prevent tax evasion.

Gel plates are legal in India with no specific restrictions, but usage must comply with general safety and import regulations.

CrPC Section 164 details the procedure for recording confessions and statements before a Magistrate to ensure legality and voluntariness.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269UK mandates filing of annual statements for specified financial transactions to ensure tax compliance.

Companies Act 2013 Section 71 governs the issuance and regulation of debentures by companies in India.

Companies Act 2013 Section 470 governs transitional provisions for companies under the new Act, ensuring smooth legal continuity.

Contract Act 1872 Section 56 explains the law of frustration and when contracts become void due to impossible performance.

CrPC Section 105A details the procedure for police to record information about missing persons and initiate inquiries.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 237 deals with the procedure for rectification of mistakes in income tax orders and assessments.

Understand the legality of dual citizenship in India, its restrictions, and practical enforcement as per Indian law.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 132 defines the term 'confession' and its role in legal proceedings as an admission against interest.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 68 outlines penalties for false or misleading advertisements to protect consumer interests.

Companies Act 2013 Section 452 governs the power of the Central Government to appoint inspectors for company investigations.

Explore the legality of hawking in India, including rules, enforcement, and common misunderstandings about street vending laws.

Companies Act 2013 Section 69 governs the register of charges and related compliance for Indian companies.

CrPC Section 401 details the procedure for the disposal of property involved in a criminal case after investigation.

CrPC Section 23 defines the territorial jurisdiction of criminal courts in India based on where the offence was committed.

IPC Section 475 defines the offence of counterfeiting valuable security or will, covering forgery and its legal consequences.

Laxmi Coin is not legally recognized as currency in India and faces regulatory restrictions under Indian law.

Cannabis legality on Indian reservations varies by tribe and state, with some allowing use under tribal law while federal restrictions apply.

bottom of page