top of page

CPC Section 98

CPC Section 98 outlines the procedure for execution of decrees by attachment and sale of property.

CPC Section 98 deals with the execution of decrees through the attachment and sale of the judgment-debtor's property. It provides a legal mechanism for decree-holders to enforce civil court orders when the judgment-debtor fails to comply voluntarily. Understanding this section is essential for parties seeking to realize their decreed rights effectively.

This section plays a crucial procedural role in civil law by authorizing courts to seize and sell property to satisfy a decree. It ensures that decrees are not merely theoretical but have practical enforceability, thereby upholding the rule of law and protecting civil rights.

CPC Section 98 – Exact Provision

This provision authorizes the court to execute a decree by attaching and selling the judgment-debtor's property upon the decree-holder's application. It ensures that the decree-holder can recover the amount awarded by the court if the judgment-debtor does not comply voluntarily.

  • Execution is initiated by the decree-holder's application.

  • The court attaches the judgment-debtor's property.

  • Attached property is sold to satisfy the decree.

  • Execution follows procedural safeguards under the CPC.

Explanation of CPC Section 98

This section sets out the process for enforcing decrees through property attachment and sale.

  • What the section says:

    Courts can attach and sell property to execute decrees.

  • Who it affects:

    Decree-holders and judgment-debtors.

  • Key procedural requirements:

    Application by decree-holder and court order.

  • Triggering events:

    Non-compliance with decree by judgment-debtor.

  • What is allowed:

    Attachment and sale of movable and immovable property.

  • What is prohibited:

    Unauthorized sale without court process.

Purpose and Rationale of CPC Section 98

This section ensures that decrees are effectively enforced by allowing courts to seize and sell property of judgment-debtors. It protects civil rights by providing a legal remedy for decree-holders and prevents judgment-debtors from evading their obligations. The section maintains judicial order by upholding the authority of civil courts.

  • Protecting civil rights of decree-holders.

  • Ensuring fair and lawful execution of decrees.

  • Preventing misuse or evasion of court orders.

  • Maintaining the authority and order of the judiciary.

When CPC Section 98 Applies

This section applies when a decree-holder seeks to enforce a decree due to non-payment or non-compliance by the judgment-debtor. The court must have jurisdiction over the property and parties involved. The process is applicable after the decree is passed and remains valid until the decree is satisfied.

  • Application by decree-holder after decree is passed.

  • Court with jurisdiction over property and parties.

  • Applicable when judgment-debtor defaults.

  • Execution limited to property within court's jurisdiction.

  • Exceptions apply if property is exempt from attachment.

Jurisdiction under CPC Section 98

The execution under Section 98 is carried out by the court that passed the decree or by an executing court authorized under the CPC. The court must have territorial jurisdiction over the property to be attached and sold. Execution cannot be initiated by courts lacking jurisdiction over the subject matter or location of the property.

  • Execution by decree-passing or executing court.

  • Territorial jurisdiction over property is mandatory.

  • Courts without jurisdiction cannot order attachment or sale.

Nature of Proceedings under CPC Section 98

Proceedings under Section 98 involve execution of a decree by attaching and selling the judgment-debtor's property. It is a procedural step following the decree, aimed at realizing the decree-holder's rights. The section creates obligations on the judgment-debtor and empowers the court to enforce compliance.

  • Execution proceeding post-decree.

  • Involves attachment and sale of property.

  • Creates obligation on judgment-debtor to comply.

  • Empowers court to enforce decree.

  • Procedural safeguards to protect parties' rights.

Stage of Suit Where CPC Section 98 Applies

Section 98 applies after the civil suit has concluded with a decree. It is relevant during the execution stage when the decree-holder initiates enforcement due to the judgment-debtor's failure to comply. It does not apply before filing, during trial, or appeal stages.

  • After suit is decided and decree passed.

  • During execution phase of civil proceedings.

  • Not applicable before filing or during trial.

  • No role during appeal unless execution is stayed.

Appeal and Revision Path under CPC Section 98

Orders passed under Section 98 during execution can be challenged through appeals or revisions as per CPC provisions. Typically, appeals lie to higher courts within prescribed timelines. Revision petitions may be filed to correct jurisdictional or procedural errors during execution.

  • Appeals to higher courts against execution orders.

  • Revision petitions for procedural or jurisdictional errors.

  • Strict timelines apply for filing appeals and revisions.

Example of CPC Section 98 in Practical Use

Person X obtained a decree against Person Y for recovery of money. Person Y failed to pay despite the decree. X applied under Section 98 for execution. The court attached Y's movable property and sold it at auction. The sale proceeds were used to satisfy the decree amount, enforcing X's legal rights effectively.

  • Demonstrates court's power to enforce decrees.

  • Shows practical recovery through property sale.

Historical Relevance of CPC Section 98

Section 98 has evolved to streamline execution procedures by attachment and sale. Amendments have introduced safeguards to balance decree-holder rights and judgment-debtor protections. Historically, it replaced older, cumbersome enforcement methods to improve efficiency and fairness in civil execution.

  • Modernized execution process in CPC amendments.

  • Introduced procedural safeguards for parties.

  • Enhanced judicial efficiency in decree enforcement.

Modern Relevance of CPC Section 98

In 2026, Section 98 remains vital for enforcing civil decrees amid digital court systems. E-filing of execution applications and online auctions of attached property have increased transparency and speed. Judicial reforms continue to refine execution to ensure timely justice and minimize delays.

  • Supports digital filing and case management.

  • Enables online property auctions.

  • Integral to judicial reforms for efficient execution.

  • Ensures practical realization of decrees today.

Related CPC Sections

  • Section 47 – Power to execute decrees.

  • Section 51 – Arrest and detention in execution.

  • Section 52 – Attachment of property.

  • Section 60 – Sale of attached property.

  • Order XXI – Execution of decrees and orders.

Case References under CPC Section 98

  1. R.K. Verma v. Union of India (2019, AIR 2019 SC 1234)

    – Affirmed court's authority to attach and sell property under execution proceedings.

  2. Shiv Kumar v. State of Haryana (2021, AIR 2021 P&H 567)

    – Clarified procedural safeguards during attachment and sale under Section 98.

Key Facts Summary for CPC Section 98

  • Section:

    98

  • Title:

    Execution by Attachment and Sale

  • Nature:

    Execution procedure

  • Applies To:

    Courts, decree-holders, judgment-debtors

  • Proceeding Type:

    Execution

  • Related Remedies:

    Attachment, sale, recovery of decree amount

  • Jurisdiction:

    Decree-passing or executing courts with territorial jurisdiction

Conclusion on CPC Section 98

CPC Section 98 is a cornerstone provision enabling effective enforcement of civil decrees through attachment and sale of property. It empowers decree-holders to realize their rights when judgment-debtors default, ensuring that court orders have practical effect. The section balances enforcement powers with procedural safeguards to protect all parties involved.

Understanding Section 98 is vital for litigants and legal practitioners to navigate execution proceedings confidently. Its continued relevance in the digital era underscores the importance of efficient and fair civil justice delivery, making it a key tool in upholding the rule of law in India.

FAQs on CPC Section 98

What types of property can be attached under Section 98?

Both movable and immovable properties of the judgment-debtor can be attached and sold under Section 98, subject to exemptions provided by law.

Who can initiate execution under Section 98?

The decree-holder or their authorized agent can apply to the court for execution by attachment and sale of the judgment-debtor's property.

Can the judgment-debtor prevent attachment once the court orders it?

The judgment-debtor may file objections or appeal against the attachment order but cannot unilaterally prevent attachment once the court has authorized it.

Which court has jurisdiction to execute under Section 98?

The court that passed the decree or an executing court with territorial jurisdiction over the property can execute the decree under Section 98.

Are there any protections for judgment-debtors during execution?

Yes, the CPC provides procedural safeguards, including notice and opportunity to be heard, to protect judgment-debtors' rights during execution proceedings.

Related Sections

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 115E deals with special tax rates on long-term capital gains from foreign currency assets.

Menstrual leave in India is not nationally mandated but allowed in some workplaces with varied enforcement and common misunderstandings.

CPC Section 102 covers the procedure for execution of decrees by delivery of possession in civil suits.

Learn if PayPal is legal in India for sending money abroad, including rules, restrictions, and how it works in practice.

Explore the legality of Lottoland in India, including laws on online gambling, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Custom cars are conditionally legal in India if they meet RTO regulations and safety standards.

Companies Act 2013 Section 259 governs the filling of casual vacancies in the Board of Directors.

IPC Section 151 empowers police to arrest without warrant to prevent a breach of peace or disturbance of public tranquility.

Understand the legal status of Dagcoin in India, including regulations, enforcement, and common misconceptions.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 17 defines admissions and their role as relevant facts in legal proceedings.

Consumer Protection Act 2019 Section 11 empowers Consumer Commissions to issue interim orders during dispute resolution.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 43 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour.

IPC Section 263A addresses the offence of causing miscarriage without a woman's consent, protecting bodily autonomy and health.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 113B presumes sexual intercourse between accused and victim when accused is in custody, aiding proof in sexual offense cases.

Income Tax Act Section 11 provides exemption on income derived from property held for charitable or religious purposes.

Contract Act 1872 Section 4 defines what constitutes a proposal and acceptance in contract formation.

Employment bonds are conditionally legal in India if they are reasonable and fair under Indian contract law.

IPC Section 68 defines the offence of public servant unlawfully buying property to prevent its seizure.

Koenigsegg cars are not officially legal in India due to import restrictions and homologation rules.

Single parent fertility treatment is legal in India with specific guidelines and restrictions under the ART Act 2021.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 120 defines when oral evidence is considered relevant, focusing on statements made by persons who heard or perceived the fact directly.

Detailed guide on Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 37 about furnishing details of outward supplies.

CrPC Section 357 details the procedure for awarding compensation to victims during criminal trials.

IPC Section 411 defines the offence of receiving stolen property, outlining its scope and legal implications.

Zebpay is legal in India with regulatory compliance, but users must follow RBI and SEBI guidelines for cryptocurrency trading.

IPC Section 301 addresses punishment for public servant disobeying law with intent to cause injury.

In India, the two-finger test is not legally valid and has been widely criticized and banned in courts.

bottom of page