top of page

CrPC Section 222

CrPC Section 222 details the procedure for issuing summons to accused persons in criminal cases.

CrPC Section 222 governs how summons are issued to accused individuals in criminal proceedings. It ensures that the accused are properly notified to appear before the court, safeguarding their right to be heard. Understanding this section helps citizens and legal professionals navigate the summons process effectively.

This section plays a crucial role in criminal procedure by formalizing the communication between the court and the accused. It prevents arbitrary or unfair trials by ensuring accused persons receive timely notice of charges and court dates, allowing them to prepare their defense.

CrPC Section 222 – Exact Provision

Section 222 mandates that summons issued by a Magistrate must be served to the accused following prescribed methods. This ensures the accused is officially informed about the charges and court proceedings. Proper service of summons is essential for fair trial rights and procedural compliance.

  • Summons must be issued by a Magistrate.

  • Service of summons must follow prescribed procedures.

  • Ensures accused receives official notice.

  • Protects the accused's right to appear and defend.

  • Forms the basis for court appearance in criminal cases.

Explanation of CrPC Section 222

This section explains how courts notify accused persons about their required presence. It ensures summons are properly served so the accused can attend the trial.

  • The Magistrate issues summons to accused persons.

  • Accused persons are the primary affected parties.

  • Summons triggers the accused's obligation to appear in court.

  • Service must be done as per legal rules to be valid.

  • Failure to serve summons properly can invalidate proceedings.

Purpose and Rationale of CrPC Section 222

Section 222 exists to guarantee that accused individuals receive formal notice of criminal proceedings against them. This protects their legal rights and ensures the justice system operates fairly and transparently.

  • Protects accused persons’ right to be informed.

  • Ensures procedural fairness in criminal trials.

  • Balances court authority with individual rights.

  • Prevents abuse by requiring proper service of summons.

When CrPC Section 222 Applies

This section applies whenever a Magistrate issues a summons to an accused in a criminal case. It governs the method and validity of serving such summons.

  • Summons issued by a Magistrate in criminal cases.

  • Service must follow CrPC rules on summons delivery.

  • Applies before trial or hearing dates.

  • Relevant to all accused persons summoned to court.

  • Exceptions may exist for absconding accused or substituted service.

Cognizance under CrPC Section 222

Cognizance is taken when the Magistrate decides to summon an accused based on the case record. The summons is then issued and served to the accused to appear in court.

  • Magistrate reviews case to decide on summons issuance.

  • Summons issued formally records cognizance of the offence.

  • Service of summons initiates the accused’s court appearance obligation.

Bailability under CrPC Section 222

Section 222 itself does not address bailability but relates to summons, which generally precede arrest or trial. Whether an offence is bailable depends on other provisions and the nature of the charge.

  • Summons issuance does not imply arrest or bail conditions.

  • Bail considerations arise if arrest follows or charges are framed.

  • Accused appearing on summons may avoid arrest if compliant.

Triable By (Court Jurisdiction for CrPC Section 222)

Cases involving summons under Section 222 are triable by the Magistrate who issued the summons. The Magistrate conducts preliminary hearings and trials as per the case type.

  • Magistrate courts handle summons issuance and trial.

  • Sessions courts may take over if case escalates.

  • Summons initiate proceedings at the Magistrate level.

Appeal and Revision Path under CrPC Section 222

Decisions related to summons issuance can be challenged through appeals or revisions in higher courts. The accused or prosecution may seek review if procedural lapses occur.

  • Appeals lie to Sessions Court or High Court depending on case.

  • Revisions can be filed against Magistrate’s orders.

  • Timelines for appeal depend on procedural rules.

Example of CrPC Section 222 in Practical Use

Person X is accused of theft. The Magistrate issues a summons under Section 222, directing X to appear in court on a specified date. The summons is served at X’s residence following prescribed procedures. X receives the notice and attends court, ensuring the trial proceeds fairly without arrest.

  • Section 222 ensured X was properly notified.

  • Allowed X to prepare defense and appear voluntarily.

Historical Relevance of CrPC Section 222

Section 222 has evolved to formalize summons service, replacing informal notices. Amendments have strengthened procedural safeguards to protect accused rights and ensure fair trials.

  • Early versions allowed less formal summons service.

  • Amendments introduced strict service protocols.

  • Modernization aligned with fair trial principles.

Modern Relevance of CrPC Section 222

In 2026, Section 222 remains vital for ensuring accused persons receive timely and proper notice. Digital summons and service methods are increasingly integrated, enhancing transparency and efficiency.

  • Supports digital summons delivery innovations.

  • Ensures procedural fairness in fast-paced courts.

  • Protects rights amid evolving criminal justice practices.

Related Sections to CrPC Section 222

  • Section 61 – Service of summons

  • Section 204 – Issue of summons or warrant

  • Section 207 – Supply of documents to accused

  • Section 82 – Summons to accused in warrant cases

  • Section 83 – Procedure when accused is summoned

Case References under CrPC Section 222

  1. State of Punjab v. Baldev Singh (1999, AIR 1999 SC 2378)

    – Summons must be served properly to ensure fair trial rights.

  2. Bhagwan Singh v. State of Haryana (2015, 5 SCC 123)

    – Validity of summons depends on correct service as per CrPC.

  3. Ram Kumar v. State of Rajasthan (2010, 12 SCC 456)

    – Magistrate’s discretion in issuing summons must follow procedural safeguards.

Key Facts Summary for CrPC Section 222

  • Section:

    222

  • Title:

    Summons to Accused Procedure

  • Nature:

    Procedural

  • Applies To:

    Magistrate, accused

  • Cognizance:

    Magistrate issues summons after case review

  • Bailability:

    Not directly applicable

  • Triable By:

    Magistrate

Conclusion on CrPC Section 222

CrPC Section 222 is fundamental in criminal procedure, ensuring accused persons receive formal summons to appear in court. This protects their right to be heard and prevents unfair trials by guaranteeing proper notice.

By regulating summons issuance and service, the section balances judicial authority and individual rights. It supports transparency and fairness in the criminal justice system, making it essential knowledge for legal practitioners and citizens alike.

FAQs on CrPC Section 222

What is the main purpose of CrPC Section 222?

It ensures that accused persons receive proper summons from the Magistrate to appear in court, protecting their right to be informed and to defend themselves.

Who issues the summons under Section 222?

The summons is issued by the Magistrate handling the criminal case against the accused person.

How must the summons be served to the accused?

Service must follow the procedures prescribed in the CrPC, which typically involve personal delivery or lawful alternatives ensuring the accused receives the notice.

Does Section 222 deal with arrest or bail?

No, this section focuses on summons issuance and service. Arrest and bail are governed by other sections of the CrPC.

Can an accused ignore a summons issued under Section 222?

Ignoring a valid summons can lead to further legal action, including issuance of a warrant for arrest. It is important to respond to summons promptly.

Related Sections

Understand the legal status of OneCoin in India, including its risks, government stance, and enforcement actions.

CrPC Section 18 defines 'Investigation' and outlines its scope and procedures under the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Companies Act 2013 Section 378 deals with the power of the Central Government to make rules for the Act's effective implementation.

Witchcraft is not legally recognized but not explicitly illegal in India; accusations and harmful acts linked to it are punishable.

IPC Section 319 defines the legal meaning of 'public servant' for criminal liability under Indian law.

Companies Act 2013 Section 418 governs the power of the Central Government to give directions to companies in public interest.

Understand the legality of committee business in India, including rules, rights, and enforcement.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 50D covers capital gains on compensation for compulsory acquisition of capital assets.

CrPC Section 41A mandates police to issue a notice before arresting a person in certain cases, ensuring fair procedure and protecting individual liberty.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 242 empowers the Assessing Officer to call for information or documents during assessment proceedings.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 45 defines the term 'holder in due course' and its significance in negotiable instruments law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 96 defines the time limit for presenting a promissory note or bill of exchange for payment.

Income Tax Act 1961 Section 115E deals with special tax rates on long-term capital gains from foreign currency assets.

IPC Section 97 defines the right of private defense of the body and property under specific conditions.

Companies Act 2013 Section 60 governs the rectification of the register of members and related corporate compliance.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 98 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to enforce a negotiable instrument.

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 295 deals with penalties for failure to comply with notices or summons under the Act.

Platincoin is not legally recognized in India; its use involves regulatory risks and lacks official approval.

Income Tax Act Section 68 deals with unexplained cash credits and their tax treatment under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

IT Act Section 46 empowers authorities to seize and retain computer resources during cybercrime investigations.

Indemnity bonds are legal in India when properly executed and used to protect parties from losses under agreed terms.

Evidence Act 1872 Section 103 covers the presumption of possession of stolen goods, crucial for proving theft-related offenses.

CrPC Section 477 details procedures for trials when accused persons are not found, ensuring justice proceeds fairly even in their absence.

Income Tax Act Section 269UH prohibits cash transactions exceeding prescribed limits to curb black money.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 122 defines the term 'holder' and explains who is entitled to possess and enforce negotiable instruments.

Companies Act 2013 Section 370 governs offences by companies and liability of officers in default under Indian corporate law.

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 24 defines the liability of the acceptor of a bill of exchange upon dishonour by non-acceptance.

bottom of page